WEEK #3

WEEK#3 With a 26-23 win over the now 0-3 Bengals there is reason for concern Gmen fans

I disagree with the "NYPOST'S "JINT'S BEAT REPORTER PAUL SCHWARTZ"= "B" grade of the secondary
I think that was to high...here is why....
.
.
.
When it was 16-13 and again when it was 23-20 Cincy marched down the field almost effortlessly. Due to Quickly designed slant passes,mostly suprise draw runs and a imagintive playbook designed to take our dline pressure out of the game, or limit their effectiveness.


Yes, We got sixxx sacks and even KiwiNuka came on like a gangbusters this week and showed why he's a former 1st round pick. eventhough I think Nuka sttill best suited for Strongside DE

FastFreddy Robbins has another two sacks and the Gmen completely harrased QB Palmer all day

However when the Gmen needed a big sack the most to stop a drive in the 4th quarter it wasn't there!!!!!!!

I kept expecting a key third down sack pushing the Cincy back to a 3rd and 16 or 4th and 16
But it never came!
I then expected a big {int}

or at least a 3rd and long or 4th down to be broken up by one of our young talented corners Ross {dont know if hes hurt bad with seperated shoulder like last year???} ...or even Webster to get a int or a pass breakup in a key situation........IT never happened


What I seen was Cincy run quick slants and their recievers find gaps in our coverage play after play and it concerns me,

ISNT THE REASON we drafted Ross and Webster becuse their bump and run man to man skills?

Why was their huge pockets lapses in coverage then from their wide recievers???????
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

WEEK #1

JUSTIN TUCK A STUD NO MATTER WHERE YOU PUT HIM



ONLY #1 SACK AND WHAT WAS KG THINKING INSIDE THE TEN

throwing it every down, almost forcing it on our first possesion in 2nd Quarter inside the ten?

why NOT run the ball we were rambling?

and only #1 sack I'm sorry Tuck played a very very good game but he doesn't have the change of direction in the open field when the QB rolls from DE, he plays better from the DT

and Kiwinuka is NO Osi
he was good against the run all night but virtually no pass rush! Tuck getting doubled team all night Osi wouldve ran around that LT pulling the LG back to help thus forcing a 3 on 3 with the rest of the line!!!

1 sack ???
a win is a win, is a win
a good win
but against a not very well coached confused team!


----------------------------------------------------
Personally I think.......Kiwinuka has to be moved to the strongside HERE'S WHY

Osi when he was in would command @ least two blockers be it the LT and LG or LT and RB.
virtually ensuring one on one for the rest of the line

Kiwi might be fast but he isn't as quick and change of direction, and bouncability-being a tall lanky DE isn't that of a smaller DE such as Osi or how McDougle is said to be!

it's been proven Tuck is solid no matter where they put him. I think his best match up is inside even as good as he is outside.
Now McDougle combine and collegiate record suggests he's faster and even more athletic than the ultra athletic Umenyiora and he's more suited for the weakside as Kiwi is for the strong side

What I'm saying is move Tuck around from RE to LE to DT, keep Kiwi @ Strong side either @ LB or DE and rotate both McDougle in and Tollefson in @ weakside with Tuck @ insurance and Kiwinuka @ strong side

that's all I'm saying!!!
I also said we would possibily have this problem NOT going after a DE in draft with Mike retiring and Osi's track record of injury every other season!!!